What soyjak nigger thinks happened:
<haha he can't understand a basic argument, i won o algo
What actually happened:
>>331439
In here he writes shit that wasnt written or implied anywhere.
>you're posting bald men that means you like bald men
>you said I'm less than a nigger that means you like niggers
He also wrote:
>You're posting 8 year old children getting fucked that means you like child pornography.
>>331448
In here I write:
>Quote the exact posts with the exact text, then explain how any of this is either written or implied. The way you're writing it now appears entirely made up.
In response to:
>you're posting bald men that means you like bald men
>you said I'm less than a nigger that means you like niggers
(At no point after this does he ever try to do what I asked him to.)
I also respond to
>You're posting 8 year old children getting fucked that means you like child pornography.
with the image of a pipe and https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/234/#
This causes soyjak nigger to panic in >>331452 and backpedals, claiming that that statement was a "reductio ad absurdum".
He then writes this:
>My (very clear) point was that if I were to claim "posting loli is pedo," it would be the same as "posting soy is homo."
Which I respond to in >>331461 by calling it a false equivalence. He has no defense against this in >>331468
>Okay?
He then goes in a loop, starting in >>331479 , where he rewrites what he wrote in previous posts. I simply refer to my previous answers, as well as summarizing the previous answers, in >>331487
In >>331486 he further tries to bullshit by claiming that he "didn't call me a pedo", which, in fact, he didn't, but is ultimately irrelevant, as it's him trying to corrupt my response in >>331448 into something that it isn't.
He then finally gives up in >>331494 , and then writes a wall of text of rage with the usual soyjak philosophy of claiming that he represents the opinion of the majority and the majority definitely thinks the same way he does.
He then spams 3 more posts before posting what he claims is an "automated message" in >>331499 in a way to signal that he definitely doesn't care, which is also part of sharty philosophy.
This rundown was written because there's a possibility of him, in the future, attempt to rewrite history by trying to refer back to this thread saying that there was a BTFOing that happened here, when the reality is that the soyjak nigger is the one that got BTFO'd. He won't elaborate on why, because he can't; he will rely primarily doing this as a preemptive attack by being the first to mention it, and then trying to deflect any responses with his usual bullshit of soyjak images and "nuh-uh", having gained a sort of psychological "priority" by being the first to mention it.
Should this happen, this rundown will serve as something to refer back to. If he tries to make his own rundown, it will be filled with a lot of insults and "you looked like this and said this" without actually quoting anything that was said.
>>331546
Here you go.