/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

>>9886
>among prominent founders there definitely were clear ideas and attempts at railing against Jews and making America a land for Whites.

George Washington letter to Newport, RI synagogue:

>For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens...

>May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-06-02-0135

John Adams:

>How is it possible [that Voltaire] should represent the Hebrews in such a contemptible light? They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their Empire were but a Bauble in comparison of the Jews. They have given religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind more, and more happily, than any other Nation ancient or modern."

>>9886
cont. with Thomas Jefferson:

>1818 May 28. (Jefferson to Mordecai-Manuel Noah). "[Y]our sect by it's sufferings has furnished a remarkable proof of the universal spirit of religious intolerance, inherent in every sect, disclaimed by all while feeble, and practised by all when in power. our laws have applied the only antidote to this vice, protecting our religious, as they do our civil rights by putting all on an equal footing. but more remains to be done. ... nothing I think would be so likely to effect this as to your sect particularly as the more careful attention to education, which you recommend, and which placing it's members on the equal and commanding benches of science, will exhibit them as equal objects of respect and favor."[2]

https://www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/jews-and-judaism/

To be fair, Jefferson thought the Hebrew Bible was barbaric, but that doesn't change the fact that the founding fathers were all Jew lovers. I could keep posting but I won't. I think you guys get the point.

Also, the Ben Franklin quote against the Jews is supposedly a hoax.

>>9869
Be careful what you wish for. A horde of rootless Americans fleeing to Eastern Europe will not enhance the nationalism of those natives.
I know you're only considering yourself but ultimately, we must engineer an American revolution.

>I know you're only considering yourself but ultimately, we must engineer an American revolution.
Ironically, the American populace thinks exclusively in the mode of "every man for himself". I doubt that such a thing as a second American Revolution could happen in such an atomized country. Therefore, 
>only considering yourself
and leaving may be the most fruitful action.

Did you guys know that Mark Collett almost got kicked out of the BNP after getting caught with 14yo girls in his hotel room? Meanwhile everyone who's anyone in the far-right gladly goes on his show. This whole scene is starting to seem like a Russian op or something.

>>9906
That was my thought process as well. I wanted to like America. But building genuinely antisemitic nationalism here would require repudiating the secular cult around the Founding Fathers and muh Constitution, which is basically the only thing American whites have in common. And of course without the antisemitism nothing will be truly fixed.

I'm not saying that forging a new white identity in America is impossible, but seeing as we're already a minority, and atomized to the point of sociopathy, it just doesn't seem likely at all. The best we'd probably get is a chunk of the place to ourselves, but seeing as the Jewish Forward is already seething about Return to the Land before they've even got off the ground, I doubt that would last either. The central government would have to totally collapse.

>>9662
In-browser PDF document viewing from a website is fine iirc. It's a security risk if you're actually downloading office documents off websites

fascism.jpg
[Hide] (3.2MB, 3900x7250) Reverse

fresh oc

>>9854
amazing,I bet you could get passing grade in 2nd grade for this

>>9855
post something better then yes?

>>9854
You made this?

>>9810
Uh oh, is he in trouble?

>>9811
No he's fine, but blatant glownigger posts need to start being deleted alongside the bans he's been handing them.

>>9811
Lost internet in Tel Aviv

>>9816
Define "blatant glownigger posts".

It's painful to see how the Jewish elite's plan is to create world poverty, to have people beg for shit, to destroy economies and even make having a decent free job almost impossible, while said elite drains even more money on AI-banking and usury by using countries' wealth as collateral and using a lot of the cash to fund racially, culturally and socially destructive policies.
The Jewish elite is nothing less than the true quintessential expression of the Judaic subconscious, that as soon as a Jew somehow succeeds in life, he or she aims at mimicking and entering the various levels of the Jewish hierarchy, up to the world elite.
That entire parasitic race should be slated for extermination.

103343f65ad954ff4abb6b12165f547ee56aa55e395523a645b206453b2f3590.jpg
[Hide] (15.1KB, 598x100) Reverse

>>9891
>The paper money is a smart system but it needs to be in good hands
Paper money is always a scam.

Giving everyone $1,000,000 wouldn't help anyone. Prices would just go up and everything would be the same as before.

Paper money only makes sense if you want to give the new money to a specific group of people so they have an unfair advantage. There is no legitimate use for it.

And it's not just an unfair advantage for the cartel of bankers who control the money printers. It makes everybody else poorer.

Supply and demand applies to everything including money. When they increase the money supply by 10% then the price of everything goes up by 10% because money is less scarce. That's what inflation is.

They print money out of thin air, give it to themselves and then everyone else pays higher prices as a result. That's how they are fucking you.

Putting "good" people in charge of paper money is like putting "good" people in charge of coin clipping. There is no "good" way to do fraud, it needs to be eliminated.

5ab5db17ee36f7d4cdd1aa6acd12cb4c3680f3d20bb7f4a2bc45640fcb9f5990.gif
[Hide] (92.7KB, 335x200) Reverse

>>9892
>Paper money only makes sense if you want to give the new money to a specific group of people so they have an unfair advantage. There is no legitimate use for it.
You have artificially restrained the use of paper money into a single case of unfair use that you pulled out of your hat.
>And it's not just an unfair advantage for the cartel of bankers who control the money printers. 
Hence why I said it needs to be in good hands. As long as that is true, there is no issue. For one, having the money production authority to be public, in the hands of the nation. That is the Thrid Reich did. Do you have an issue with the sound monetary principles used by the Third Reich?
>Supply and demand applies to everything including money. When they increase the money supply by 10% then the price of everything goes up by 10% because money is less scarce. That's what inflation is.
Not always if the supply is increased precisely when there is a demand of more money when, for example, production increases. It's a resource that needs to be properly managed and balanced.
>They print money out of thin air
Typical libertarian take here. Money is a tool and, yes, a tool can be produced.
>give it to themselves and then everyone else pays higher prices as a result. That's how they are fucking you.
You don't even realize that you're shooting your own foot because the issue is not of money being printed or minted as coins, but its unfair spreading.
Evil people will always find ways to scam people, even with gold, cows or salt.
>Putting "good" people in charge of paper money is like putting "good" people in charge of coin clipping. There is no "good" way to do fraud, it needs to be eliminated.
How grand, but your claim would be much more convincing if you had proven how money printing were a bad thing to begin with.
>Gold and silver are not "too expensive" it is paper money that becomes more and more worthless as they print more and more of it.

>>9896
>You have artificially restrained the use of paper money into a single case of unfair use that you pulled out of your hat.
That's the economic system you live under right now. If you are too financially illiterate to even understand that much then you are beyond fucked.

>Hence why I said it needs to be in good hands. 
Everytime more paper money is printed it makes everybody else poorer. The very idea of paper money is a scam.

>Money is a tool and, yes, a tool can be produced.
Why can't you produce your own money then? What's the difference between you putting $1 on some green paper and a jew at the federal reserve doing it? Why can't everyone just print their own money?

>You don't even realize that you're shooting your own foot because the issue is not of money being printed or minted as coins, but its unfair spreading.
Gold is real. Banks can't create gold out of thin air and spend it. You have to do work to get more gold out of the ground.

>So the value of paper is arbitrary and there's no reason for gold to be so expensive? Then okay, let's say the dollar now lines up at 1:1 with gold.
Before the federal reserve when there was a real gold standard 1oz gold was $20. Now 1oz gold is $3400. That's how much paper money they printed out of thin air and profited from. That's how much they stole from you in the last 112 years.

>>9883
>>9892
I hate to rain on everyone's parade but if your nation literally uses gold currency, you're going to suffer constant bullion crises. If you trade with a neighboring country that does not use gold, although their currency will be worth less than yours, you will end up trading gold for literally paper. Then they will have gold to sell and you'll have paper that is worthless for everything except trading back to them. 
Furthermore, you bring up coin clipping. That would instantly become a problem again the moment you bring back gold currency.

834d95aa7ee377f24b66feb627ac8a8037c102f0ef8c57ea594dbcc23f435e18.jpg
[Hide] (46.4KB, 484x516) Reverse

f58651daa65e351afa1a170c8e2632f2fa6bec0b4e26d985222afc1224f21efb.jpg
[Hide] (64.6KB, 632x680) Reverse

>>9903
>I hate to rain on everyone's parade
I hate to rain on your parade but governments and central banks hoard and trade gold with each other all the time. The US dollar is still sort of the world currency for everyday trading but vaults of the Chinese or Russian central bank is not filled with worthless paper dollars. Governments already have a gold standard for their peers. The fiat standard is for slaves.

>if your nation literally uses gold currency, you're going to suffer constant bullion crises
You mean the governments and banks will pretend they have more gold than they really do and when it comes time to pay the bill then there won't be enough gold in the vaults? That's called fraud. If your biggest argument against a gold standard is that jews can't scam people anymore then what are you doing.

>If you trade with a neighboring country that does not use gold, although their currency will be worth less than yours, you will end up trading gold for literally paper
Ok I'm going to deploy a very complicated economic maxim so just make sure you are mentally prepared for this. Are you ready? Don't trade your gold for worthless paper.

>you bring up coin clipping. That would instantly become a problem again the moment you bring back gold curren

>>9715 (OP) 
good info here
http://3pdirectory.com/opsec-osint/

>>9874
>opsec site
>unusable without enabling Javascript
Hmmm...

discord_pedos_pebblewhack.png
[Hide] (552KB, 1350x675) Reverse

>>9864
You touch on an interesting point that it is really an unholy duo of smartphone with 24/7 I-net connection + social media that is really cancerous. Proto-SocMed existed pre-smartphone, but it wasn't as pervasive.

Today we have pretty much an Augmented Reality from cyberpunk. With more and more "interfaces" (which means intersecting surfaces - checkout point in a local grocery store is an interface) transfered to the gay kind of cyber.

The modern "Internet" is basically a cattle pasture owned by a handful of big corpos (Meta, Jewgle/Alphabet, Amazon, Jeetrosoft) and everything outside of it is labeled as "scary darknet" which is "full of pedophiles" by lugenpresse.

Then there is reddit, which was purposefully built to destroy small, decentralized forums. And don't get me started on discord - it actually is full of homosexuals, pedophiles, and intelligence agents.

Even if you managed to take down the internet how would you prevent any conglomerate like Facebook or Reddit from rising and establishing monopolies again?

>>9877
sus

>>9878
Interface is more and more becoming a code word for "Jew in the middle."
>The modern "Internet" is basically a cattle pasture owned by a handful of big corpos (Meta, Jewgle/Alphabet, Amazon, Jeetrosoft) and everything outside of it is labeled as "scary darknet" which is "full of pedophiles" by lugenpresse.
>Then there is reddit, which was purposefully built to destroy small, decentralized forums. And don't get me started on discord - it actually is full of homosexuals, pedophiles, and intelligence agents.
Perfect analysis anon.
Add Cloudflare to protect us from ebil spam. Cloudflare therefore sees everything you browse. And now Palantir.

>>9834
I guess early Freemasons were based before they got kiked. Their syncretic approach was their death kneel.

44af7c3b69b2f3b5639140eaf82096500c56f9a920ecd6076fa0f281400783c8.jpg
[Hide] (167.1KB, 720x1361) Reverse

be214e0c5d58879209dccf532b591bf440eb11f3969172eb487f20c1e29936fe.jpg
[Hide] (174.4KB, 720x1382) Reverse

e7e6f05c5798d6f1978db2eeada117432d59258e3e28202faeba0a9ea3c534c0.jpg
[Hide] (155.7KB, 720x1151) Reverse

Tiresome, superversive and cringe.

>>9861
Rene Guenon in his studies of Freemasonry investigates this point. His conclusion was that Anti-Tradition (Satan and his willing and unwilling pawns) subverted the movement at some relatively recent time in history, just as it's about to be done with Catholic Church, and wears the corpse of the dead tradition as some kind of a mental-spiritual skinsuit.

>>9879
>Satan
Kike word.

>>9866
That's just an attempt by globohomo to coopt our symbols. This simply cannot happen with >>9422

>>9881
Yes but try to move beyond such kneejerk reactions to understand the meaning of the point. Satan in their language is the final big boss.
Freemasonry seems to have been infiltrated and spun around the mid 17th Century, IIRC.
It really depends on how we appreciate the concept of Tradition because from our perspective, the notion of care is paramount to our survival, but it is totally denied by Perennialists, at least of the kind who work from Guenon and perhaps that bizarre Schuon guy. At the end the latter seems to have somehow betrayed the former, who himself dropped the ball by marying into a North African family in Egypt. Despite this, Guenon would talk about Atlantis being itself a sort of revival, or kind of vestige or reboot of the much older Hyperboria. But what, did he think that Hyperboria was some kind of multicultural society? From our point of view, denial of race definitely is one of the weapons of this enemy. Also, Guenon spoke of Anti-Tradition and the much worse Counter-Tradition that was the real active force at work to destroy all traces of said Tradition.

>>9773
>how do you think Germany could have hit Churchill's cabinet?
So, first off, Hitler should have executed Wilhelm Canaris, who was the chief of German foreign intelligence and working to overthrow Hitler. I think he was involved in one of the plots to kill him.
I admit secondly that I'm not as deeply familiar with the inner workings of the Churchill regime as the Germans were in 1940 (or at least, should have been)
However, if I were chief of the Abwehr, I would have spent a considerable deal of effort tracking the locations of key figures in his government. 
Now, assassinating them would be ideal but two factors make it difficult. The first is that Hitler was a real old school, chivalrous fellow and you just know that if you proposed assassinating Churchill, Hitler would come up with reasons not to. But if he could be reasoned with, I'm sure many undercover assassinations could have been put together to make it look like an accident. Just like the assassination of Patton, maybe Churchill's allies could be run over by cars or poisoned or even shot down as they traveled around. 
Basically, Germany should have invested way more into intelligence and counter intelligence than they did. 
As you suggest, Hitler should have put WAY more into funding Mosely and also into funding counter-communist forces in the USSR, before and after 1941. 

Lastly, if I were Hitler, or at least had his ear, I'd urge him to do what the Allies did to Napoleon: Don't declare war on France or the UK or the USSR. Declare war on the governments and go out of your way to be seen as a liberator.
With France, it doesn't matter overly much but, if I may Ryan Faulk this and change one aspect of Hitler's character but leave everything else intact, here is how I would have conducted the war.

>1939, issue orders to Danzig NSDAP to stage massive protest for referendum on joining Germany (I absolutely HATE how Hitler didn't do this IRL. It would have been extremely easy to do as support for the NSDAP in Danzig was at 90%)
>Sept. 1939, Invade Poland. 
It is possible that Hitler could have aligned with the National Radical Camp. Not sure what concessions he would need to make but I'm presuming that Hitler absolutely would need to annex former Imperial German borders, so the NRC might have been intransigent. If so, we would make no change in the timeline because, (I presume) Hitler would go through with the Ribbentrop pact and for a variety of geopolitical reasons, Poland would need to be occupied rather than liberated. 

>>9774
>Lastly, if I were Hitler, or at least had his ear, I'd urge him to do what the Allies did to Napoleon: Don't declare war on France or the UK or the USSR. Declare war on the governments and go out of your way to be seen as a liberator.
That would not be enough and the governments in question would quickly produce a propaganda that would blur any possible difference between attacking the nation from attacking the government.
Germany would also need to have at least two major newspapers to support that ideology to counter the government's message but soon enough these papers could have been shut down. Without investing in a CIA-like insurgency it would have been pointless.
Germany could have played the modern realpolitik and not act in her name but use proxies. For one, train and arm Germans in Northern Poland, around Danzig. Do the same in Czechoslovakia. At least the German minorities could bite back. Then as you said, in the meantime fuel the desire for a popular vote to be tied to Germany. Start a transparent exchange program on economics and culture. Include non-Germans too living close to the areas of interest to soften them. This would have avoided any official participation in war. It would however require, once again, an intelligence apparatus that would be sufficiently implanted to enmesh itself into the targeted population and capable of producing enough loca

>>9785
>train and arm Germans in Northern Poland, around Danzig. Do the same in Czechoslovakia. At least the German minorities could bite back. Then as you said, in the meantime fuel the desire for a popular vote to be tied to Germany
I'm making the assumption that Alt-Hitler is locked in on annexation of north-western Poland.
Actually, you raise a good idea. A few German rebel groups would give a good excuse to invade. Poles would retaliate, Hitler would be outraged and publish the atrocities in every newspaper, and intervene. Combine this with a referendum and most Brits would question why they need to support a Polish dictatorship against a democratic election.
WW2 postponed. 
> I don't explain how they could produce such a harsh propaganda about Jews holding the USA, Canada and England, and think that this grip would suddenly evaporate.
This was Hitler's greatest failing. He knew about the jews. Yet he usually failed to treat countries as jewish tools but fought the countries themselves. Obviously, I'm not chiding him for bombing Russians or British cities. But look at how the Israelis are taking Iran apart. Imagine that the Ayatollah and his clique were jews. The real jews are targeting him and his supporters in much the same way that Earl Turner and the Organization targeted jews and their supporters in the Diaries. There's a chapter

Ethnic minorities.

>>9882
Yes, there's that. And the fact that Jews come in so many different types that they always manage to find one of them to blend into the host nation.
There are Jews living peacefully in Iran for example.
How could have the Hezbollah been smoked that easily? Well for one they used devices that transited through Israel, so they're stupid. It's even worse than having a backdoor on a CPU pressed in Kikeland. Second, the Hezbollah is close to the Hamas, and the Hamas is by all likeliness an Israeli asset.

In order to attain final victory, we'll have to massacre over 90% of the world's population, and that will inevitably include millions upon millions of traitorous Whites. Cops, soldiers, government employees, judges, lawyers, politicians, journalists, political activists, businessmen, and so on. Those who perpretrated race-mixing, those who joined subversive NGOs, those who adopted non-White children, those who sold houses to non-Whites because it was more profitable than to sell to Whites, those who participated in charities favoring non-Whites. They will all have to face ultimate justice. I know it's a truly uncomfortable thought, but it's one every Fascist will have to confront, process and internalize. Without hardening the heart against misguided compassion, we will lose.

Collateral damage is always acceptable.

>>9727
It does sound brutal but I think there's a possibility that we will get there.

>>9654
>/b/
>d*scord lolcowterally who
What's the difference with kiwifarms?

If the First Amendment seemed to be a good idea on paper, it has now become an integral part of the slow boiling process that cripples us. It's precisely because we believe we still can solve things by talking that we refuse to rely on action instead, too scared of appearing uncultured, uncivilized. But talk is cheap.
I have more faith in countries wherein Whites have lost most of their liberties.

Non-clandestine activism is worthless. Doesn't matter how many marches you attend or how many members your clearnet forum has, you'll never get anything meaningful done because you'll be too preoccupied with staying squeaky clean so as to not give the authorities an excuse to shut you down. And that's sometimes not enough, you can be as law-abiding as you want and they'll still arrest you, put you on a wtach list or freeze your assets. Take a good look at AfD.

>>9703
Considering the fact that you cannot even say that we control a single small town in our own nations, my priority is not what happens in Africa.

The Day of the Rope would be immensely more impactful now than in Pierce's time.

>>9712
To control a town you would need to control the water source nearby. You may do without electricity, which I encourage more and more bizarrely if you want to go that way, but water is essential. Water and guns. With that you can drink, your cattle can drink, you can maintain salubriousness and grow food, which you can eat, use to feed your cattle or even convert to a small extent into fuel. Guns, in turn, help you defend all of this. But you need all the village to be on the same page, not just a single Waco camp. And then all nearby villages need to be operating in similar ways and show some solidarity so that even cops or feds may disappear.

>>9833
That's all well and good but towns are not isolated outposts. If a band of merry men somehow did cut off the water supply to the town of Appalachia in Appalachia, they would still be unable to even enter in daylight without being annihilated by police and National Guard forces. 
They must either have legal protection for being there (ie, they won a local election) or they must possess superior firepower to the US military, in which case, cutting off water is unnecessary.

hydra1.jpg
[Hide] (3.3MB, 3200x9000) Reverse

hydra2.jpg
[Hide] (3.3MB, 3100x9000) Reverse

white3.jpg
[Hide] (2.7MB, 2200x7000) Reverse

>>9446
moar

>>9822
White children with leftist or other maladaptive genes should be aborted. Intraracial equality is almost as insane as race denialism.
>>9823
There is nothing rational about letting defective genes spread freely.

>>9823
Sure, this kind of law would be but a fragment of an entire set of strict racial laws that would make it damn near impossible to even see women get to feel anything positive about mixing. The propaganda and a new culture would see to this too. Say perhaps a new religion on top of this to solidify the whole thing.
>>9824
>White children with leftist or other maladaptive genes
Leftist genes?
>There is nothing rational about letting defective genes spread freely.
Correct. The idiocratic system favors the spread of these genes.

9fb4fbd9778eb05d31211ffa73934306ba5cb964f19984b5507458b505f7e236.jpg
[Hide] (568.1KB, 1536x2048) Reverse

Anti-White Stasi

>>16 (OP) 
there is a new fascist forum out there somewhere
they posted a blurb at either ourchan or 8kun a few hours ago but now it is deleted

something FF ??

>>9871
they posted again at ourchan and got deleted again
fashfront dot org