>>1775
The thing with the T14 is you just have to center of mass it in 3/4ths of the turret; it's only ~101.6mm thick cast armor, and it's early cast armor at that so it's only worth 0.96x.
And, yes, I'm aware that a there are a lot of tanks with thinner turret armor on the sides/rear. The Tiger H1's turret is only 82mm thick on the sides a full BR higher.
The difference is you can angle most of those turrets and bounce shots, you cannot do that with the T14.
With the exception of the front and a perfect 45 degrees off either side (of its front) a center-of-mass shot on the turret will go through for every on-tier (or above) gun that isn't an SPAA, secondary, US 75mm (or it's derivatives) outside of 250m, or the Russian ZiS-5. Frontally, you just hit it on either side of the mantlet, it's about 10mm less effective thickness vs most guns. If you're on that perfect 45 degree angle, you just have to shoot its turret a little bit lower than center-of-mass (admittedly a much harder shot to make at range).
This being the reason why the T14 is not a good tank. If you know where to shoot it, it's vulnerable to its peers from any angle; and that vulnerable part is impossible to hide seeing as its sitting on top of the hull and is easy to hit at most ranges.
For most tanks that have glaring weakpoints (MG ports and Mail Slots, for example) you actually have to aim for that point; with the T14, your