>>437
>>i don't like it when new software has defects because of retarded development cycles, can we just like stop innovating at all, goys?
>hey dude, we don't want to hire a big quality control team, can you report new bugs for us please?
stop breaking things that work. I hate everything new, I think I'm going to disable internet completely eventually and just downgrade to books or something.
>It's the most skewed in favor of png example
If it really was, it wouldn't show such results, now would it.
Sites that actually specialize in pixel art store it in original size, but upscale it in browser. There are buttons to make it smaller or bigger, and some css option to upscale without pixelart getting blurry. This is the proper way to handle pixelart, instead of this jpg/png with each pixel being 64x64 pixel square retardation. Why finetune your codec for retardation like this. Gif can actually be smaller than png in some cases, for example when number of colors is exactly 16 or for very small images.