>>55
I'm going to be extremely clear here, because you seem to be illiterate.
People talked about the meidos in >>41, >>42, and >>43. Then you replied in >>45 and said "It's less about what they do and more about what they've done." You were clearly discussing the administration of smuglo.li.
There was a reply to you in >>49, which stated that the anon believed you were referring to "what they've done" meaning the problems that Hoihoi caused on old 8chan's database. >>49 also replied to a different post as well, and that post was also discussing the administration of smuglo.li.
Then you replied in >>52 and talked about Hiroyuki and Jim, who had not been mentioned in the post you replied to, or any of the posts it replied to, or any of the posts they replied to. Do you understand this? Do you understand that smuglo.li and Jim/Hiroyuki are different people? This is why >>53 replied and called you a dishonest faggot arguing in bad faith: because you are. You were deflecting away from the topic at hand. I'll as you again: why do you have such a stick up your ass about the administration of smuglo.li?
>pic related
Am I supposed to know who that is? Substantiate your claims, you nigger. You're acting like a drama-addicted /cow/poster.
>an out-of-context picture is all the proof I need
You pompous retard.
>This is a meta thread, which is always an exception of whatever rules are in place
I have literally never encountered a single board where that was the case. You are a hypocrite and you're getting desperate.
>I'm giving other people who dislike the administration of smug an opportunity to thrive without walking on eggshells
The moderation on smug/tg/ hasn't changed. Chrow is still in charge and rules from other boards, like Hoihoi, don't apply. /tg/ already has an alternative to 8glow, and it's on smuglo.li. What do you provide that smug/tg/ does not?
>echo chamber
<nap/v/
<8glow/v/
<smug/vg/
<PLW/v/
None of those boards has rules that forbid you from talking about other boards.