>>15770
>>15764
Not how neoteny works. Children have hair on their arms, just not as thick as men. men get hair later on the face, in the ass, and even on the stomach and chest, whereas women stay more child looking, but not just over hair like some lioness, they also stay small and have childlike voices and less thick skin, but thinner wrinkles easier so getting old is a bitch for them. At the same time glowing faces look better than an ogre. Their heads stay like a third smaller if I recall. Then there's the hip vs arm stuff and gaining less muscle. Their noses are a key difference and foreheads with ow the test mutates you over time into a 'more adult' look. But, not just hair, and when it is they are supposed to have armpit hair, you were just programmed by sissies. Sissies love to shave their whole body too as the Ancient Greekds did that fucked little boys. They were gender benders. In today's times that is frowned upon. le paydo, and so now what you are meant to objetdively be attracted to is not gay but also not overly quelled females like int he past when they had no right to show hair on their legs, keeping it covered to avoid being seen as a slut, now they can show the legs and obviously they don't have to shave them either, nor the arms, but humans got so damned christfaggy that the dresses and sleeves and gloves and the headdresses, it drove people insane. I'm surprised we didn't shave their hair as >>16018 implies we could have randomly, but the headdress didn't stay around as long as the dress and sleeves. Men must have assumed, due to banning of porn too and such, that women had no hair on the arms nor legs, nor even crotch perhaps, so they started shaving due to our mal-raised culture here. The ancients would have known what nudity looked like, but we at some point did not.
All that being considered in our slightly past christfaggotry state that we are now in one being afraid of arm hair is.....kinda gay. A faggot pedo would shave the whole body. Ass hair, crotch, chest, etc, to keep cleanly and shiny while in their manly biker suits and stuff during their anal fisting scenes. what's more, the hair getting into the anal folds, the fissures, can probably create a problem, I'm sure they have their reasons but most gays have short hair.
My point is over all, you grow up in today's times seeing the arm hair on you as a child, girls too in school, so what's the problem? Do you not find her attractive when she has on jeans and shirt? It's all about the face really. They don't get hair on the face, barring eyebrows and lashes of course.
Back on the the anal fisting videos, not all of them shave their arms, I wonder why?
>>15766
When a straight male it's basically just less on arms and legs to be attracted to and zero to be on the face. Zero to be on the chest either, but men get hair on chest and face and more on legs and arms. The only real issue is the face. it's our mane, or whatever like with lions not having one when female. One did have one, but nevermind.
>mustaches
no fag
>>15787
That's because men have thicker skin. It's a testosterone effect. Not just about the hair. And women are into class more than actual beauty unlike men.
>>15788
yes, it's the christfaggot effect of the lack of nudity making people think women had no hair, so then once finally naked again we shaved it off to avoid discomforting the males lest they go crazy and fuck little boys as preachers, of which did happen.